Following the French Revolution, an English scholar wrote an account of Greek history from a mostly political point of view. He apparently was writing with the fear of revolution in mind or was thinking that Great Britain may just decide to become some sort of democracy, which to him was an evil that brought only chaos. It permeated his work. At the time his history of Greece was written, there had not been much of an emphasis on the study of ancient Greece. There was more of a focus on Rome. As far as scholarly works on the subject, there wasn't much competition. So, once it was published, apparently it was widely read. A few years later, an Australian came out with his own history of ancient Greece that was possibly not so anti-democratic and became a more popular and current book. The Englishman's work was not forgotten entirely, but was put on the back burner. Whatever his intention, obviously the world has not forgotten about democracy's origins. It is such a great idea, that even some countries that we would not consider democratic at all have a democratically phrased constitution, such as the former Iraq. Yes, the one under Saddam, the dictator. So pretty language on paper itself doesn't guarantee anything, but democracy has lived on despite those who have not been true in deed as well as in word. Perhaps there is a modern cautionary tale concerning democracy in there?
The idea of the city state, or polis, growing out of defensible positions, such as the Acropolis, is very interesting. I was just in Athens a few months ago, and when you are at the top looking over the city, you can see how the ancient is still the center of the modern there. It is such an amazing sight, and you really do get the sense that it is the center which the city has grown out of. The people are very protective of it and I would say, very proud. Their past is still very much a part of their present, and I can imagine how secure an ancient Athenian would have felt in the shadow of the Acropolis. Then there is the temples and all the activity that would have centered around that area. That security, pride, duty to the polis and the fact that the conquered were not automatically the Athenian's slaves may have contributed to the increasing over-population of Athens. It would have been an interesting time to live in Athens, for sure.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
So Tarl, who was that British historian and who was that Australian? Just curious whom you mean.
The English "historian" was William Mitford, but I guess he was more of a politician and writer/ commentator than anything else. He was a member of parliament and wrote about many things, but his history of Greece, "from Homer to Alexander", was apparently his best known work. The "Australian" historian...oops...is actaully George Grote, who was in fact, ahem, English. I must have been in a hurry and had kangaroos on my mind or something. I will be sure to check and reference better in the future. The article title is "A Tory History of Ancient Greece" and can be found from the Albertson's library online. Here is the link, http://find.galegroup.com.libproxy.boisestate.edu/ips/retrieve.do?contentSet=IAC-Documents&resultListType=RESULT_LIST&qrySerId=Locale%28en%2C%2C%29%3AFQE%3D%28KE%2CNone%2C24%29a+tory+history+of+greece%24&sgHitCountType=None&inPS=true&sort=DateDescend&searchType=BasicSearchForm&tabID=T002&prodId=IPS&searchId=R1¤tPosition=1&userGroupName=bois91825&docId=A16737265&docType=IAC&contentSet=IAC-Documents
Post a Comment